Skip to main content
ControlFrame
AI-native audit & compliance

Evidence.
Under control.

Turn scattered artifacts into a clear, connected audit. AI prepares the evidence. Your team makes the call.

Evidence workbenchIllustration
Original document
Access control policyNorthwind · version 6.0
Policy
Source passage§ 2 · Password requirements
All interactive user accounts must use a password of at least 14 characters.
Exact source. Traceable version.
Minimum password length14 characters
Grounded in the document

A stated parameter, with its original passage attached.

Design evidence only
Source → proposal → decisionHuman acceptance required
Synthetic policy · interactive illustration
From source to decision

Connect the evidence.

AI proposes requirement mappings. The source travels with every suggestion.

Glass evidence cards pass through sculpted control frames toward an amber human-review station.
Workflow illustration
Verify it yourself

A signed synthetic reference specimen — no customer evidence or production custody. Your browser verifies the actual signature with no account or network call.

governed-receipt/v1 · 2026-08-24

Proof, not promises

Each card is a real object with its own record. The counts are read from the source at build time, never typed.

  1. Receipt

    A signed reference receipt

    The specimen the strip above verifies: a canonical body, its digest, and a signature the public key inside the receipt can check. Synthetic data; no customer evidence.

    Format
    governed-receipt/v1Ed25519
  2. Verifier

    The offline verifier

    One HTML file that recomputes a receipt's chain and signature on the reader's own machine. Save it once; it needs no account and makes no network call.

    File
    offline-verifier.html40 KB · self-contained
  3. Catalog

    NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, release 5.2.0

    One framework release ingested from its issuing source and normalized into a catalog, with the source digest retained so the pin can be re-checked.

    Source
    01f37cf90e…9bc062NIST OSCAL Content v1.5.0 · OSCAL 1.2.2
  4. Registry

    84 tracked frameworks

    Every regime the product tracks, with its issuing authority, current edition, and product standing. Only a regime with a catalog behind it is counted as one.

    Schema
    controlframe.framework-registry.v3generated 2026-08-30

Built for accountability

Every step accountable.

AI prepares the work. Your team controls what moves forward.

Your judgment is the boundary.

A named reviewer decides whether the proposed action may proceed. AI cannot approve its own work.

Held for a decision

Illustrated workflow · no live run or approval

Explore the safeguards
Control
A rule enforced at a specific point in the workflow.
Gate
A check that holds work until its condition is met.
Authority
The person or policy authorized to let work proceed.
Receipt
A linked record of what happened, signed when eligible.
Verifier
A tool that checks the record independently, offline.
Controls the platform enforces, with their trigger, authority, evidence, and recourse
SafeguardWhen it appliesWho or what decidesRecord retainedIf it cannot proceed
Held writeAn agent proposes a writeA named reviewerHeld-for-review record in the decision passportRefused, or approved and re-run
Artifact intakeA file enters quarantinePinned scan policyScan record with engine and definitions digestsHeld in quarantine
Package releaseA package is submitted for releaseNamed human sign-offHash-pinned release recordHeld, with the blocking gate named
Recipient accessA recipient opens a packageA live grantGrant manifest and activation windowRefused when revoked or expired
Runner admissionA private runner asks for workControl-plane token bindingWorker profile and package digest in the tokenDenied
Evidence freshnessAn artifact ages past policyFreshness policyStale controls listed in the sweep receiptRecollect at source

A verified record proves integrity. Evidence sufficiency, approval, package eligibility, and release each require their own checks.

By the numbers

Counts the records can back.

Frameworks tracked in the registryregistry v3 · generated 2026-08-30
84
Frameworks with a control catalog on diskthe honest denominator for any coverage claim
6
Catalog units in NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, release 5.2.01,014 active · 182 withdrawn
1,196
Fields in the reference receipt body2 chain steps · one signature · one public key
16

Assurance intelligence · official sources

Standards change. Stay informed.

The changes that affect your audit, with the original sources and practical next steps.

Browse source briefings
Program update

FedRAMP 20x Class B and Class C pipeline opens August 31.

The Consolidated Rules for 2026 move FedRAMP toward persistently maintained security-decision records, reusable certification data, and human- and machine-readable packages, with the Class B and Class C pipeline scheduled to open August 31, 2026.

What to do next

Connect each security decision to its measure, validation, independent review, change history, and released package rather than rebuilding a static folder for every agency.

  1. 02
    Regulatory milestone

    EU AI Act enforcement is now a staged operating calendar.

    Commission enforcement powers apply to provisions already in force, while transparency duties apply from August 2026 and the amended high-risk deadlines move to December 2027 and August 2028 by system class.

  2. 03
    Draft guidance

    NIST publishes draft guidance for using AI in CSF analysis.

    The initial public draft of SP 1353 illustrates AI-assisted CSF analysis, planning, implementation, and monitoring while calling for precautions and continuous evaluation and improvement.

  3. 04
    Standards release

    HITRUST CSF v11.8 refreshes authoritative-source mappings.

    Version 11.8 continues requirement-statement consolidation and refreshes mappings including PCI DSS v4.0.1 and the AICPA SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria.

Editorially reviewed August 30, 2026

Authority changes become versioned work; they do not silently overwrite prior evidence.

01 / The ControlFrame difference

Assurance infrastructure, not another AI checklist.

The defensible system is the chain around intelligence: source-native methods, bounded execution, human-held authority, and one governed record operators and authorized recipients can inspect from their own view.

Four connected layers · one decision record
01

Method Graph

Implemented foundation

Turn assurance methodology into governed procedure.

Versioned procedures bind scope, approved sources, tools, budgets, and human gates before work begins.

  • Version-pinned procedures
  • Source and tool allowlists
  • Named authority gates
Inspect orchestration
02

Governed Agent Runtime

Implemented

Give every agent a bounded job and a visible stop.

Collection and testing operate inside declared authority. Exceptions route to people; agents do not inherit release power.

  • Scoped agent authority
  • Human-in-loop decisions
  • Run receipts and replay
Review architecture
03

Private Assurance Runtime

Purpose-built model planned

Keep specialist reasoning inside the approved boundary.

Customer-controlled endpoint routing exists today. The purpose-built private assurance model for evidence classification, extraction, and drafting remains in development.

  • Private endpoint routing
  • Task-bounded reasoning
  • Evaluation before activation
Not presented as available todayReview private-runtime boundary
04

Governed Receipt · Evidence Passport

Implemented for eligible releases

Make the decision record portable and inspectable.

The passport is the portable decision record. For eligible releases, its governed-receipt schema binds identity, model trace, human disposition, and chain state for offline verification.

  • Source-to-decision lineage
  • Human disposition retained
  • Offline verification path
Open offline verifier
Regulatory sourceVersioned methodGoverned workHuman decisionPortable proof
Explore the operating system

Compose the method, then see how an assurance team carries it into fieldwork.

Compose a governed workflowOpen Engagement Studio

Keep the evidence current between audits.

Observe approved sources, collect through bounded jobs, preserve artifact identity, propose control mappings, route exceptions, and release only through named human authority. The reference below shows the operating contract; tenant execution stays inside activated workspaces.

Reference operating modelContinuous evidence control plane
reference workflowno tenant write · human release authority
01Approved sources
User journeysApproved browser scenarios
interactive
Systems of recordAPIs, exports, events
source-bound
Document estatePolicies, approvals, attestations
versioned

Credentials and supervised MFA remain inside the approved customer boundary.

Agentic evidence operations

Execute the work. Keep the proof.

Every configured job carries its source, expected artifact contract, control context, reviewer state, and release boundary.

01
Monitor

Freshness and change signals

observing
02
Collect

Approved source journeys

04 captures
03
Seal

Digest, context, custody

verified
04
Map

Native control + reuse candidates

review
RUN-2048evidence.capture → artifact.digest → source.mapreview required
03Governed outputs
Evidence repository

Artifacts, documents, versions, freshness, owners

governed record
Control graph

Source obligation, control IDs, reviewed projections

traceable reuse
Audit package

Completeness, exceptions, approvals, release state

human gated

Evidence reuse remains advisory until an authorized reviewer confirms sufficiency.

Between-audit readiness loop
  1. 01Observe
  2. 02Collect
  3. 03Validate
  4. 04Map
  5. 05Review
  6. 06Release

Connector catalog

3 collecting · 36 declared in the registry · 12 shown

Open the connector catalog
  • GitHub
  • GitLab
  • Bitbucket
  • Okta
  • Amazon Web Services
  • Microsoft Azure
  • Google Cloud
  • Kubernetes
  • Datadog
  • Splunk
  • Snowflake
  • Jira

Each mark names a connector definition in the registry. A connection exists for an organization only once its own credential has validated against the provider.

The product is the decision record.

Follow one synthetic healthcare enrollment journey from browser interaction to captured artifact, mapped control, and an explicit human review boundary.

See the workflow, then inspect its custody trace.

The recording shows the browser journey. The companion trace illustrates capture, artifact identity, and the human-release boundary; it is not a signed custody record.

ready to replayRUN-2048 · separate browser scenario
recorded synthetic journeyreference browser boundary
0:00 / 0:00

Recorded browser journey. Real clicks produce browser-local PNG captures and SHA-256 digests; the adjacent trace illustrates the production custody boundary.

4 PNG capturesSHA-256 digestshuman release boundary

One evidence spine. Framework-native modules.

Each tracked regime carries explicit source and product standing. Where a catalog and method are released, one governed cross-reference layer can propose reuse without presuming the target reviewer’s conclusion.

A source-backed learning instrument

See exactly where authority ends and judgment begins.

Explore one real release from issuing source to normalized catalog, retained assessment context, and named human acceptance. Every station carries its own status; the path never fills a missing fact with a claim.

Open the Catalog Observatory
NIST SP 800-53Rev. 5

Release 5.2.0

AuthorityNIST · Release 5.2.0
Source01f37cf90ea9…6e9bc062
Catalog1,196 catalog units
MethodRetained · inactive
DecisionHuman required
Catalog units
1,196
Active
1,014
Withdrawn
182
Objective nodes
3,715
Source-bound releaseAssessment context retained · inactive

Stop rebuilding the audit room.

Whether the audit is SOC 2, HITRUST, PCI DSS, HIPAA, or CMS EDE, the handling lives in the evidence. Adjust the hours-first model to your own program and see the effort returned; then confirm it against observed work in a scoped pilot.

At fieldworkTraditional preparation
  1. Request files
  2. Chase owners
  3. Normalize folders
  4. Remap controls

People coordinate every request

Prepared continuouslyControlFrame evidence operations
  1. Observe freshness
  2. Collect at source
  3. Route exceptions
  4. Release by review

People govern exceptions and release

Illustrative capacity model

Model the hours returned to your team.

Illustrative annual hours returned 1,470

Modeled capacity, not guaranteed savings or a price quote. Adjust the assumptions to your own program and see the effort returned.

Requests addressed
1,260
Human or non-automated hours retained
2,030
Evidence operating load3,000 requests/year · 70% addressable · 60% modeled reduction
modeled handling reductionhuman or non-automated workload
Illustrative annual capacity value$135,240

Equivalent to 0.7 capacity years under these assumptions. This is a modeled equivalent, not observed savings.

min
min
min
%
%
/hr

Method: annual requests × role handling time × addressable share × modeled reduction × blended hourly value. Excludes implementation, platform and independent assessment fees, and work that policy keeps human-only.

ControlFrame prepares the record. Independent assessors render the opinion.

Qualified assessors, CPA firms, certification bodies, and other authorized third parties keep their existing authority. ControlFrame makes the evidence easier to inspect; it does not certify the customer.Enter the proof room

In the family

A LockedIn Labs application.

ControlFrame is the control plane beside two sibling properties: the LockedIn Labs FDE platform, which runs engagements, and the FDE Benchmark, which measures the work. ControlFrame is where the controls around that work are held and proved. All three are LockedIn Labs properties; these links go to our own sites. About ControlFrame

Bring the workflow that costs you most.

We will map its systems, labor, controls, authority gates, and measurable pilot outcome in one executive working session.

Request a walkthrough
ControlFrame - Compliance evidence that needs no trust.